Breaking News, Top Breaking News, Liberal News
Liberal news Liberal News

Blogadsgay



Tears of joy as Connecticut begins civil unions

by Julie A. Weisberg
     
   


Tears were in the eyes of Barbara LeCornec as she watched her friends, a gay couple together for more than seven years, become one of the first to enter into a civil union in the state of Connecticut Saturday morning.

"This is such an emotional time," LeCornec said with a soft smile, standing proudly in the foyer of the Stamford City Hall and looking on as the city's mayor, Dannel Malloy, presided over her friends' civil union ceremony. "Those are my boys."

LeCornec and her longtime partner Maureen Boylan, as well as dozens of gay and lesbian couples, entered into civil unions Saturday around Connecticut, as the state become only the second in the country, after Vermont, to allow same-sex civil unions; and the first to extend civil union rights to its gay and lesbian residents without external pressure from the courts.

Many couples waited in line Saturday morning to obtain and register their civil unions, as a handful of the state's town clerk's offices, the majority of which are closed on the weekend, opened up specifically to allow gays and lesbians to obtain and register their civil unions on the first day the went into effect, Saturday, Oct. 1.

Laura DeNardis and Deborah Smith began waiting in line at the Stamford Town Clerk's Office just before the office opened at 9 a.m. The lesbian couple, who have been together for 15 years, moved to Connecticut from Virginia in June, specifically to gain the ability to enter into a same-sex civil union.

"We felt that it was necessary to move and make a statement,” DeNardis explained, just before the mayor unionized the couple at city hall. "We decided to take our tax dollars elsewhere. And so now we are paying higher taxes in Connecticut -- but it is worth it,"

 

 

 

And, although the two were married several years ago in a private, religious ceremony, that event did not afford the women any additional rights and responsibilities in the eyes of the state, local or federal government. Something, they said, which can now be partially rectified with Connecticut’s laAnd, although the two were married several years ago in a private, religious ceremony, that event did not afford the women any additional rights and responsibilities in the eyes of the state, local or federal government. Something, they said, which can now be partially rectified with Connecticut's law.

“This really gives us the legal recognition and the (state) protections that goes with it,” Smith said just after the couple obtained their civil union license Saturday. “So we felt that it was prudent to do this as soon as possible.”

Stamford Mayor Dannel Malloy, a Democrat hoping to retain his seat in this November’s municipal elections, presided over a handful of civil union ceremonies Saturday morning at city hall. Malloy, who has also thrown his hat into the state’s gubernatorial race ring, said Saturday he would also preside over private ceremonies later that day.

“The law has changed and people now have a set of rights, and I support that, and I have demonstrated my support of that, and will continue to do so today, and I am honored to be asked to perform some ceremonies,” Malloy said shortly before he began unionizing gay and lesbian couples. “Some of these people are my friends.”

According to a civil unions primer put together by Love Makes a Family (LMF) and GLAD, and posted on LMF’s Web site, a Connecticut civil union gives same-sex couples “automatic inclusion within and under hundreds of Connecticut state laws that apply to married spouses, family and next of kin.”

The primer states that Connecticut’s Office of Legislative Research identified the following categories of laws that will include civil union couples: family law, including marriage, divorce and support; title, tenure, descent and distribution, intestate succession, wills, survivorships; state and municipal taxation; probate courts and procedure; group insurance for government (but not private-sector) employees; family leave benefits; financial disclosure and conflict-of-interest rules; protection against discrimination based on marital status; emergency and non-emergency medical care and treatment, hospital visitation and notification, and authority to act in matters affecting family members; state public assistance benefits, workers’ compensation and crime victims’ rights; and marital privileges in court proceedings.

 

STORY CONTINUES ON PAGE 2


   

Originally published on Monday October 3, 2005.


Copyright © 2005 PageOneQ. All rights reserved. Privacy policy